United States v. Kinney
358 F. App'x 995
Opinion
Steven Kinney appeals pro se from the district court’s May 29, 2008, order denying his requests for documents and to unseal a portion of the record. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion when it denied Kinney’s post-judgment motions.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Kinney, 358 F. App'x 995 (9th Cir. 2009).
358 F. App'x 995 (United States v. Kinney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Final decisions of district courts
28 U.S.C. § 1291