United States v. King
This text of United States v. King (United States v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 21-20110 Document: 00516227774 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/07/2022
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED March 7, 2022 No. 21-20110 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Leroy King,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:09-CR-342-5
Before Jolly, Willett, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Leroy King has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). King has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 21-20110 Document: 00516227774 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/07/2022
No. 21-20110
portions of the record reflected therein, as well as King’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. King, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-king-ca5-2022.