United States v. King

Fourth Circuit

United States v. King

675 F. App'x 355

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 3, 2017·No. No. 16-7318·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marsha King appeals the district court’s orders denying her “Motion To Stay Restitution Until Release From Incarceration and To Set Schedule Payments for Assessment Fine” and her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. King, No. 2:14-cr-00065-RAJ-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 6 & Sept. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [356] in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Marsha King appeals the district court’s orders denying her “Motion To Stay Restitution Until Release From Incarceration and To Set Schedule Payments for Assessment Fine” and her motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. King, No. 2:14-cr-00065-RAJ-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 6 & Sept. 15, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented [356] in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

United States v. King, 675 F. App'x 355 (4th Cir. 2017).

Pincite

675 F. App'x 355 (United States v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.