United States v. Kinard

507 F. App'x 281
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 24, 2013·No. No. 12-4494·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM.

Kelsey Lentrell Kinard appeals the district court’s amended judgment granting the Government’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. To the extent that Kinard’s claim that the district court failed to consider various factors in determining the extent of the sentence reduction challenges the lawfulness of the district court’s sentencing methodology, we have jurisdiction over Kinard’s appeal. See United, States v. Davis, 679 F.3d 190, 194 (4th Cir.2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kinard, 507 F. App'x 281 (4th Cir. 2013).

507 F. App'x 281 (United States v. Kinard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Davis
679 F.3d 190 (Fourth Circuit, 2012)