United States v. Kinard
This text of 507 F. App'x 281 (United States v. Kinard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Kelsey Lentrell Kinard appeals the district court’s amended judgment granting the Government’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) motion. To the extent that Kinard’s claim that the district court failed to consider various factors in determining the extent of the sentence reduction challenges the lawfulness of the district court’s sentencing methodology, we have jurisdiction over Kinard’s appeal. See United, States v. Davis, 679 F.3d 190, 194 (4th Cir.2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
507 F. App'x 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kinard-ca4-2013.