United States v. Kimpson
This text of 307 F. App'x 45 (United States v. Kimpson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Kimberly Ann Kimpson appeals from her bench-trial conviction for disorderly conduct, in violation of 41 C.F.R. § 102-[46]*4674.390. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Kimpson contends that her conviction should be reversed because there was insufficient evidence at trial that she had notice that her conduct was prohibited. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the government, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could have found that the applicable regulation was posted in a conspicuous place on the property. See United States v. Lunstedt, 997 F.2d 665, 667-68 (9th Cir.1993).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
307 F. App'x 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kimpson-ca9-2009.