United States v. Kim

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Kim

13 F. App'x 150

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 5, 2001·No. No. 01-6590·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Robert Chaegon Kim appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of [151] the district court. United States v. Kim, Nos. CR-97-117-A; CA-00-1645-AM (E.D.Va. Feb. 7, 2001; filed Mar. 9, 2001, entered Mar. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Robert Chaegon Kim appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2000) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s orders and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of [151] the district court. United States v. Kim, Nos. CR-97-117-A; CA-00-1645-AM (E.D.Va. Feb. 7, 2001; filed Mar. 9, 2001, entered Mar. 13, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Kim, 13 F. App'x 150 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

13 F. App'x 150 (United States v. Kim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related