United States v. Kim A. Earlycutt

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 2, 2020·No. 19-14031·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 19-14031 Date Filed: 10/02/2020 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________

No. 19-14031 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00084-LMM-JKL-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KIM EARLYCUTT,

Defendant-Appellant. ________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia ________________________

(October 2, 2020)

Before JILL PRYOR, BRANCH and LUCK Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal

waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert,

997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence appeal waiver will be enforced Case: 19-14031 Date Filed: 10/02/2020 Page: 2 of 2

if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Bascomb, 451 F.3d

1292, 1297 (11th Cir. 2006) (appeal waiver “cannot be vitiated or altered by

comments the court makes during sentencing”); United States v. Grinard-Henry,

399 F.3d 1294, 1296 (11th Cir. 2005) (waiver of the right to appeal includes

waiver of the right to appeal difficult or debatable legal issues or even blatant

error).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kim A. Earlycutt, (11th Cir. 2020).

United States v. Kim A. Earlycutt (United States v. Kim A. Earlycutt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Mauricio Grinard-Henry
399 F.3d 1294 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)
United States v. Bennie Bascomb, Jr.
451 F.3d 1292 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)
United States v. James Bushert
997 F.2d 1343 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)