United States v. Kilbourn

10 F. App'x 546
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedMay 29, 2001
DocketNo. 99-50785; D.C. No. CR-98-22-RJT
StatusPublished

This text of 10 F. App'x 546 (United States v. Kilbourn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kilbourn, 10 F. App'x 546 (9th Cir. 2001).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM2

Gary Lynn Kilbourn appeals from his guilty plea conviction and sentence for unarmed bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113. Kilbourn’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) and has moved to withdraw on the ground that the appeal does not have merit. Kilbourn has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Having conducted an independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), we conclude that there are no arguable appellate issues.

Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Penson v. Ohio
488 U.S. 75 (Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 F. App'x 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kilbourn-ca9-2001.