United States v. Kid and Watson

8 U.S. 1, 2 L. Ed. 531, 4 Cranch 1, 1807 U.S. LEXIS 361
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedFebruary 18, 1807
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 8 U.S. 1 (United States v. Kid and Watson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kid and Watson, 8 U.S. 1, 2 L. Ed. 531, 4 Cranch 1, 1807 U.S. LEXIS 361 (1807).

Opinion

8 U.S. 1 (____)
4 Cranch 1

THE UNITED STATES
v.
KID AND WATSON.

Supreme Court of United States.

*2 Rodney, Attorney General.

THIS case was certified from the circuit court of the district of Pennsylvania, upon a division of opinion between the judges of that court, upon the question whether certain articles of copper, viz. round copper bars, round copper plates, and round copper plates turned up at the edges, imported by the defendants, were subject to duty, within the meaning of the acts of congress; viz. 20th July, 1789 — and 10th of August, 1790, vol. 1. p. 251. § 1. by which "copper in plates" is exempt from duty, and the act of the 2d of May, 1792, vol. 2. p. 71. § 2. by which "copper in pigs and bars" is also exempt from duty.

The jury found a special verdict, the substance of which was, that such articles as those in question, are of no use in the form in which they are imported, but are worked up as a raw material. That the round, the square and the flat bars are, by the manufacturers and artists, known by the denomination of "bars." That all the articles are sold by weight, and the same price is paid for round as for square or flat bars; and for round plates, and round plates turned up at the edges, as for square or oblong plates. "And that all the aforesaid *2 articles come under the description of bars and plates."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Washington International Insurance v. United States
678 F. Supp. 902 (Court of International Trade, 1988)
Altieri v. United States
50 Cust. Ct. 197 (U.S. Customs Court, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 U.S. 1, 2 L. Ed. 531, 4 Cranch 1, 1807 U.S. LEXIS 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kid-and-watson-scotus-1807.