United States v. Keys

Ninth Circuit

United States v. Keys

143 F.3d 479, 1998 WL 205438

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 20, 1998·No. No. 93-50281·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

ORDER

The motion of the United States to reinstate portions of the three-judge panel opin[480]*480ion reported at 67 F.3d 801 (9th Cir.1995) is GRANTED. The Opinion filed January 20, 1998, slip op. 563, and appearing at 133 F.3d 1282 (9th Cir.1998), is therefore amended as follows:

Slip op. page 573, line 17, 133 F.3d at 1286, immediately before “We agree with Judge Kleinfeld’s analysis ... ”; is amended to add as footnote # 1 this language:

1. Because we now affirm Keys’s conviction of perjury, we reinstate and reaffirm the parts of the original three-judge panel opinion rejecting his claims of substantive and sentencing error, specifically Part II, C. and D.

The defendant-appellant’s request for rehearing is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The motion of the United States to reinstate portions of the three-judge panel opin[480]*480ion reported at 67 F.3d 801 (9th Cir.1995) is GRANTED. The Opinion filed January 20, 1998, slip op. 563, and appearing at 133 F.3d 1282 (9th Cir.1998), is therefore amended as follows:

Slip op. page 573, line 17, 133 F.3d at 1286, immediately before “We agree with Judge Kleinfeld’s analysis ... ”; is amended to add as footnote # 1 this language:

1. Because we now affirm Keys’s conviction of perjury, we reinstate and reaffirm the parts of the original three-judge panel opinion rejecting his claims of substantive and sentencing error, specifically Part II, C. and D.

The defendant-appellant’s request for rehearing is DENIED.

United States v. Keys, 143 F.3d 479, 1998 WL 205438 (9th Cir. 1998).

Pincite

143 F.3d 479 (United States v. Keys) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related