United States v. Key
This text of United States v. Key (United States v. Key) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-4203
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
STEVEN J. KEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern Dis- trict of West Virginia, at Beckley. Elizabeth V. Hallanan, Senior District Judge. (CR-95-195)
Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999
Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert F. Cohen, Jr., Natalie J. Sal, COHEN, ABATE & COHEN, L.C., for Appellant. Rebecca A. Betts, United States Attorney, Philip J. Combs, Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Steven Key appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed.
R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. Key sought reconsideration of his crim-
inal conviction and sentence while his direct appeal was still
pending. Because Rule 60(b) is inapplicable to criminal cases and
because the district court lacked jurisdiction to reconsider Key’s
conviction while it was pending on appeal, we affirm the order of
the district court. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the mate-
rials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Key, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-key-ca4-1999.