United States v. Kevin Randall Whited

983 F.2d 1059, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 37248, 1992 WL 389286
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 30, 1992
Docket92-6396
StatusUnpublished

This text of 983 F.2d 1059 (United States v. Kevin Randall Whited) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kevin Randall Whited, 983 F.2d 1059, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 37248, 1992 WL 389286 (4th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

983 F.2d 1059

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kevin Randall WHITED, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 92-6396.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: August 21, 1992
Decided: December 30, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CR-90-217-A, CA-91-1389-AM)

Kevin Randall Whited, Appellant Pro Se.

Melinda Ann Rishkofski, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Kevin Whited appeals from the district court's orders refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Whited, Nos. CR-90-217-A, CA-91-1389-AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 10, 1992; Mar. 30, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Waid (James Carl, Jr.) v. Blankenship (w.d.)
983 F.2d 1059 (Fourth Circuit, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
983 F.2d 1059, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 37248, 1992 WL 389286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kevin-randall-whited-ca4-1992.