United States v. Kevin M. Wright
This text of 76 F.3d 390 (United States v. Kevin M. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
76 F.3d 390
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kevin M. WRIGHT, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 95-55908.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 23, 1996.*
Decided Jan. 30, 1996.
Before: ALARCON, HALL and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
We affirm the district court's denial of federal prisoner Kevin M. Wright's 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his criminal conviction on double jeopardy grounds. See United States v. Cretacci, 62 F.3d 307 (9th Cir.1995) (administrative forfeiture of unclaimed property does not constitute punishment); United States v. Washington, 69 F.3d 401, 404 (9th Cir.1995) ( Cretacci applies retroactively).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 F.3d 390, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 7394, 1996 WL 36185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kevin-m-wright-ca9-1996.