United States v. Kerr

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 9, 2026
Docket24-50960
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Kerr (United States v. Kerr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kerr, (5th Cir. 2026).

Opinion

Case: 24-50960 Document: 119-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/09/2026

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals ____________ Fifth Circuit

FILED No. 24-50960 June 9, 2026 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce ____________ Clerk

United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Francis Kerr,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:23-CR-2406-1 ______________________________

Before Davis, Wilson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* Francis Kerr was convicted by a jury of illegal reentry into the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2), and the district court sentenced him to 30 months of imprisonment and three years of supervised release.

_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-50960 Document: 119-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/09/2026

No. 24-50960

Kerr asserts that he received an unfair trial because the district court erroneously denied his challenge for cause against a juror who is a United States Border Patrol agent. Although the record reflects the district court indeed denied the challenge for cause, it also reflects that the prospective juror ultimately did not serve on the panel. The record does not reveal that defendant exercised a peremptory challenge to excuse this juror. In sum, Kerr fails to show any error related to jury selection and impartiality. See United States v. Pratt, 728 F.3d 463, 473 (5th Cir. 2013), abrogated on other grounds by Molina-Martinez v. United States, 578 U.S. 189 (2016); United States v. Wharton, 320 F.3d 526, 535 (5th Cir. 2003). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Wharton
320 F.3d 526 (Fifth Circuit, 2003)
United States v. Renee Pratt
728 F.3d 463 (Fifth Circuit, 2013)
Molina-Martinez v. United States
578 U.S. 189 (Supreme Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Kerr, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kerr-ca5-2026.