United States v. Kerr

369 F. App'x 74
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided March 9, 2010·No. Nos. 09-12183, 09-12184·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Gerald S. Bettman, appointed counsel for Jermaine Garfield Kerr in these two direct criminal appeals, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant in both cases and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeals is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw from both appeals is GRANTED, and Kerr’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kerr, 369 F. App'x 74 (11th Cir. 2010).

369 F. App'x 74 (United States v. Kerr) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)