United States v. Kent
This text of 230 F. App'x 411 (United States v. Kent) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, David Kent raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Stone, 306 F.3d 241, 243 (5th Cir.2002), which held that no Sixth Amendment violation arises when a district court considers the existence of prior convictions rather than presenting the question to a jury in sentencing the defendant under the Armed Career Criminal Act. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 F. App'x 411, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kent-ca5-2007.