United States v. Kenny Funderburk

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Kenny Funderburk

60 F.3d 826, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24927, 1995 WL 381938

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 28, 1995

Docket95-6432

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 826 (United States v. Kenny Funderburk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Kenny Funderburk, 60 F.3d 826, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24927, 1995 WL 381938 (4th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 826
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Kenny FUNDERBURK, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-6432.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 28, 1995.

Kenny Funderburk, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Funderburk, Nos. CR-92-30-P; CA-95-61-3-P (W.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 826
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Kenny FUNDERBURK, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 95-6432.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 18, 1995.
Decided: June 28, 1995.

Kenny Funderburk, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Davis Bell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlotte, NC, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Funderburk, Nos. CR-92-30-P; CA-95-61-3-P (W.D.N.C. Feb. 6, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 826, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24927, 1995 WL 381938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kenny-funderburk-ca4-1995.