United States v. Kenneth W. Seales

865 F.2d 1269, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 152, 1989 WL 816
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 10, 1989
Docket88-3607
StatusUnpublished

This text of 865 F.2d 1269 (United States v. Kenneth W. Seales) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kenneth W. Seales, 865 F.2d 1269, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 152, 1989 WL 816 (6th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

865 F.2d 1269

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kenneth W. SEALES, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 88-3607.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Jan. 10, 1989.

Before BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., NATHANIEL R. JONES and ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant, Kenneth W. Seales, appeals from an order of the district court, denying his motion for dismissal of the indictment on double jeopardy grounds in this instant bid-rigging case.

Having carefully considered the record on appeal, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel, we are unable to say that the district court erred in denying plaintiff's motion for dismissal of the indictment. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED, upon the reasoning set forth in the district court's memorandum and order of July 1, 1988.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riggsbee v. Wislon
865 F.2d 1269 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
865 F.2d 1269, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 152, 1989 WL 816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kenneth-w-seales-ca6-1989.