United States v. Kenneth Virgil Gregory

65 F.3d 178, 1995 WL 511112
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedAugust 30, 1995
Docket95-7045
StatusPublished

This text of 65 F.3d 178 (United States v. Kenneth Virgil Gregory) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kenneth Virgil Gregory, 65 F.3d 178, 1995 WL 511112 (10th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

65 F.3d 178

NOTICE: Although citation of unpublished opinions remains unfavored, unpublished opinions may now be cited if the opinion has persuasive value on a material issue, and a copy is attached to the citing document or, if cited in oral argument, copies are furnished to the Court and all parties. See General Order of November 29, 1993, suspending 10th Cir. Rule 36.3 until December 31, 1995, or further order.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kenneth Virgil GREGORY, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-7045.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

Aug. 30, 1995.

Before TACHA, LOGAN and KELLY, Circuit Judges.2

ORDER AND JUDMENT1

Defendant-appellant Kenneth Virgil Gregory entered a plea of guilty to one count of possession of firearms by a convicted felon, 18 U.S.C. 922(g). Applying the U.S.S.G. 2K2.1(c)(1)(A) cross-referencing provision, the district court sentenced Mr. Gregory under U.S.S.G. 2A1.5, conspiracy or solicitation to commit murder. Mr. Gregory now appeals, and his counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and 10th Cir. R. 46.4.2, as well as a motion to withdraw as Mr. Gregory's counsel of record.

This Circuit has previously considered and rejected the argument set forth by Mr. Gregory in United States v. Willis, 925 F.2d 359, 360-62 (10th Cir.1991), where we held that when a defendant unlawfully uses a firearm to commit other unlawful conduct, the other unlawful conduct may provide a basis for sentencing.

We AFFIRM the judgment and GRANT Mr. Bryant's motion to withdraw as counsel of record for Mr. Gregory.

1

This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and collateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and conditions of the court's General Order. 151 F.R.D. 470 (10th Cir.1993)

2

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The cause therefore is ordered submitted without oral argument

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Bill Eric Willis
925 F.2d 359 (Tenth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 F.3d 178, 1995 WL 511112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kenneth-virgil-gregory-ca10-1995.