United States v. Kenneth Simpson

704 F. App'x 609
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Kenneth Simpson. Read the opinion of the Court — 932 F.3d 1154
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided December 4, 2017·No. 16-4498·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Robert Simpson, proceeding pro se, appeals after the District Court 1 revoked his supervised release for the second time, sentenced him to 18 months in prison, and reimposed a life term of supervised release.

After reviewing the record, we conclude that Simpson’s jurisdictional and double-jeopardy arguments amount to collateral attacks on his conviction and sentence, see United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 913 (8th Cir. 2009) (“A defendant may challenge the validity of his underlying conviction and sentence through a direct appeal or a habeas corpus proceeding, not through a collateral attack in a supervised-release revocation proceeding.”), and that his remaining arguments lack merit. Simpson also moves to strike a brief filed by his former counsel. Because Simpson is proceeding pro se, we have not considered the arguments raised in the counseled brief, and we deny as moot the motion to strike.

We affirm the judgment.

1

. The Honorable Rodney W. Sippel, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kenneth Simpson, 704 F. App'x 609 (8th Cir. 2017).

704 F. App'x 609 (United States v. Kenneth Simpson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Untitled Case
E.D. Missouri, 2026