United States v. Kenneth Redd

354 F. App'x 268
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedDecember 4, 2009
Docket08-2561
StatusUnpublished

This text of 354 F. App'x 268 (United States v. Kenneth Redd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kenneth Redd, 354 F. App'x 268 (8th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Redd appeals the district court’s 1 denial of his Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33 motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. We find that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Redd’s motion, as the evidence that Redd submitted was available before his trial, and was not relevant to the issues in his suppression motion or his trial. See United States v. Grover, 511 F.3d 779, 783 (8th Cir.2007) (standard of review; requirements to justify new trial under Rule 33).

Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed. We also grant counsel’s motion to with *269 draw and deny Redd’s motion for appointment of new counsel.

1

. The Honorable Charles A. Shaw, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Grover
511 F.3d 779 (Eighth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
354 F. App'x 268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kenneth-redd-ca8-2009.