United States v. Kenneth Ray Hunter
This text of 710 F. App'x 585 (United States v. Kenneth Ray Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Kenneth Ray Hunter appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion to vacate his underlying criminal judgment, which had already become final, based on alleged fraud on the court. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Breit, 754 F.2d 526, 530-31 (4th Cir. 1985) (there is no rule similar to Rule 60(b) for criminal judgments and district courts therefore may not vacate a judgment in a criminal case that has already become final). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
710 F. App'x 585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kenneth-ray-hunter-ca4-2018.