United States v. Kenneth Randall Harley

14 F.3d 597, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4990, 1994 WL 6258
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 12, 1994
Docket93-6565
StatusPublished

This text of 14 F.3d 597 (United States v. Kenneth Randall Harley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kenneth Randall Harley, 14 F.3d 597, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4990, 1994 WL 6258 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

14 F.3d 597
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Kenneth Randall HARLEY, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-6565.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 1993
Decided: Jan. 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-42-16-D, CA-92-563-1)

Kenneth Randall Harley, appellant pro se.

Benjamin H. White, Jr., United States Attorney, Greensboro, NC for appellee.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Harley, Nos. CR-88-42-16-D; CA-92-563-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 F.3d 597, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 4990, 1994 WL 6258, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kenneth-randall-harley-ca4-1994.