United States v. Kenneth Peebles

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Kenneth Peebles

419 F.2d 830, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 11291

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 8, 1970

Docket13826

StatusPublished

This text of 419 F.2d 830 (United States v. Kenneth Peebles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Kenneth Peebles, 419 F.2d 830, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 11291 (4th Cir. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appealing from his conviction on August 13, 1969 in the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia of stealing Government property from a Navy warehouse at Portsmouth, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 641, Kenneth Peebles makes three assignments of trial error. The Court erred, he contends, in these respects: (a) by refusing to admit into evidence as an exhibit a fingerprint report prepared by the F.B.I.; (b) by granting the Government’s motion ,to strike the testimony of one of its own witnesses; and (c) by refusing him in *831 advance of trial a list of the persons to whom the Government had, prior to his arrest, submitted photographs for identification purposes.

Upon reviewing each of these contentions against the whole record, we find none of them justify a reversal and the evidence sufficient to convict.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appealing from his conviction on August 13, 1969 in the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia of stealing Government property from a Navy warehouse at Portsmouth, in violation of 18 U.S.C. 641, Kenneth Peebles makes three assignments of trial error. The Court erred, he contends, in these respects: (a) by refusing to admit into evidence as an exhibit a fingerprint report prepared by the F.B.I.; (b) by granting the Government’s motion ,to strike the testimony of one of its own witnesses; and (c) by refusing him in *831 advance of trial a list of the persons to whom the Government had, prior to his arrest, submitted photographs for identification purposes.

Upon reviewing each of these contentions against the whole record, we find none of them justify a reversal and the evidence sufficient to convict.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

419 F.2d 830, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 11291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kenneth-peebles-ca4-1970.