United States v. Kenneth Mah
This text of United States v. Kenneth Mah (United States v. Kenneth Mah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION JUN 23 2011
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U .S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 10-50568
Plaintiff - Appellee, D.C. No. 3:09-cr-01564-BEN
v. MEMORANDUM * KENNETH POON MAH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Roger T. Benitez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 15, 2011 **
Before: CANBY, O’SCANNLAIN, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
Kenneth Poon Mah appeals from the 60-month sentence imposed following
his guilty-plea conviction for manufacturing marijuana and aiding and abetting, in
violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we vacate and remand.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Mah contends that the district court erred in determining that he was
ineligible for safety-valve relief under U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2, because it applied a
clearly improbable burden of proof. We agree. See United States v. Ferryman,
444 F.3d 1183, 1186 (9th Cir. 2006) (the burden is on the defendant to prove by a
preponderance of the evidence that he qualifies for safety valve relief).
The case is remanded for the district court to determine whether Mah can
prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that he qualifies for safety-valve relief.
See United States v. Nelson, 222 F.3d 545, 550-51 (9th Cir. 2000).
VACATED and REMANDED.
2 10-50568
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Kenneth Mah, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kenneth-mah-ca9-2011.