United States v. Kenneth L. Bowden
This text of 416 F.2d 972 (United States v. Kenneth L. Bowden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
416 F.2d 972
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kenneth L. BOWDEN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 24573.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Oct. 20, 1969.
Hardy Myers, Jr. (argued), Rives & Schwab, Portland, Or., for appellant.
Tommy Havtz (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., Sidney I. Lezak, U.S. Atty., William B. Borgeson, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, Or., for appellee.
ORDER
Before BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and TAYLOR,1 District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
We have examined the record and are satisfied that the evidence was sufficient to support the trial court's determination that defendant's confession was voluntary. The judgment is affirmed.
Honorable Fred M. Taylor, United States District Judge for the District of Idaho, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
416 F.2d 972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kenneth-l-bowden-ca9-1969.