United States v. Kenneth Kang
This text of 632 F. App'x 422 (United States v. Kenneth Kang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Kenneth Huidong Kang appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the six-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for criminal conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 371, and harboring illegal aliens, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324(a)(1)(A)(iii) and (a)(1)(B)(i). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Kang argues that the district court erred by denying his request for a three-level mitigating role adjustment under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. We review a district court’s determination that a defendant did not have a mitigated role for clear error. See United States v. Rosas, 615 F.3d 1058, 1066 (9th Cir.2010). In light of the facts, including the length of Kang’s involvement in the conspiracy and his harboring of illegal aliens in his own home, the district court did not clearly err in denying the adjustment. See id. at 1067-68.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
632 F. App'x 422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kenneth-kang-ca9-2016.