United States v. Kenneth Gordon, Jr.

544 F. App'x 504
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 4, 2013
Docket13-30186
StatusUnpublished

This text of 544 F. App'x 504 (United States v. Kenneth Gordon, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kenneth Gordon, Jr., 544 F. App'x 504 (5th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Kenneth A. Gordon, Jr., appeals his conviction for conspiracy to commit wire fraud and wire fraud stemming from his role in a scheme to defraud an insurance company by staging a theft of heavy equipment and submitting a false claim for the loss. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the conviction, noting his testimony that he did not commit the offenses and arguing that the Government’s chief witness, co-conspirator Don Newton, was not credible. Because he failed to renew his motion for a judgment of acquittal at the close of all of the evidence, we review for a manifest miscarriage of justice. See United States v. Rodriguez-Martinez, 480 F.3d 303, 307 (5th Cir.2007).

The verdict shows that the jury believed Newton’s testimony over Gordon’s. This credibility finding “was within the sole province of the jury as the fact finder,” and we “will not second guess ... its choice of which witness[ ] to believe.” United States v. Zuniga, 18 F.3d 1254, 1260 (5th Cir.1994). Contrary to Gordon’s assertion, the evidence that he sold a piece of the equipment after filing the insurance claim was admissible, as it indicated his knowledge of the offenses, his plan, and his motive. See Fed.R.Evid. 404(b). We find no manifest miscarriage of justice in his conviction. See Rodriguez-Martinez, 480 F.3d at 307.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Zuniga
18 F.3d 1254 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Rodriguez-Martinez
480 F.3d 303 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
544 F. App'x 504, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kenneth-gordon-jr-ca5-2013.