United States v. Kenneth Campbell

11 F. App'x 650
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided April 10, 2001·No. 00-3824·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[UNPUBLISHED]

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth C. Campbell appeals the sentence imposed by the district court after Campbell pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute cocaine base. On appeal, Campbell challenges the district court’s denial of Campbell’s downward-departure motion, and contends the use of his prior convictions to establish his criminal history category and resulting imprisonment range violates Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000). We disagree. The district court’s denial of Campbell’s downward-departure motion is unreviewable because the court was aware of its authority to depart and declined to do so, and Campbell’s Apprendi argument is without merit because there is no requirement that past *651 convictions be included in the indictment, submitted to the jury, and proven beyond reasonable doubt. See Apprendi, 530 U.S. 466,120 S.Ct. at 2362-63.

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kenneth Campbell, 11 F. App'x 650 (8th Cir. 2001).

11 F. App'x 650 (United States v. Kenneth Campbell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Campbell v. United States
537 U.S. 878 (Supreme Court, 2002)