United States v. Kenneth Adams Tolliver
This text of 318 F.2d 323 (United States v. Kenneth Adams Tolliver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
318 F.2d 323
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kenneth Adams TOLLIVER, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 15216.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
June 20, 1963.
Appeal from United States District Court; Frank J. Battisti, J.
Seymour A. Terrell, Cleveland, Ohio (Terrell, Williams & Salim, Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellant.
Nathaniel R. Jones, Asst. U. S. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio (Mrele M. McCurdy, U. S. Atty., C. M. Diamond, Gerald J. Celebrezze, Asst. U. S. Attys., Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for appellee.
Before O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and WILSON and FOX, District Judges.
ORDER.
This Cause having come on to be heard upon the record, briefs and appendices, and upon the arguments of counsel, and upon due consideration thereof,
It Is Ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and it is, hereby affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
318 F.2d 323, 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 4901, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kenneth-adams-tolliver-ca6-1963.