United States v. Kendy Carpenter

357 F. App'x 927
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 14, 2009·No. 09-30134·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Kendy Carpenter appeals from the 24-month sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for bankruptcy fraud, violating the Federal False Claims Act, federal student loan fraud, and federal food stamp assistance fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 152(3), 287, 1001(a)(2) & (3). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Carpenter contends that the district court procedurally erred by applying an upward departure and that her sentence above the Guidelines range is substantively unreasonable. A review of record demonstrates that the district court properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing factors and that based on the totality of the circumstances, the sentence imposed is not substantively unreasonable. See United States v. Vanderwerfhorst, 576 F.3d 929, 935 (9th Cir.2009); see also United States v. Hilgers, 560 F.3d 944, 947-48 (9th Cir.2009).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kendy Carpenter, 357 F. App'x 927 (9th Cir. 2009).

357 F. App'x 927 (United States v. Kendy Carpenter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Vanderwerfhorst
576 F.3d 929 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)
United States v. Hilgers
560 F.3d 944 (Ninth Circuit, 2009)