United States v. Kendrick R. Epping

71 F. App'x 608
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedAugust 8, 2003
Docket03-1472
StatusUnpublished

This text of 71 F. App'x 608 (United States v. Kendrick R. Epping) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kendrick R. Epping, 71 F. App'x 608 (8th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kendrick Epping appeals the district court’s 1 imposition of a 10-month prison term and an additional 26-month supervised-release term, upon revocation of his supervised release from a bank robbery conviction. On appeal, he argues that the district court instead should have imposed inpatient treatment.

*609 After careful review of the record, we find that the sentence was within the limits of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Grimes, 54 F.3d 489, 492 (8th Cir.1995) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.

1

. The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. James Grimes
54 F.3d 489 (Eighth Circuit, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
71 F. App'x 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kendrick-r-epping-ca8-2003.