United States v. Kendrick R. Epping
Opinion
Kendrick Epping appeals the district court’s 1 imposition of a 10-month prison term and an additional 26-month supervised-release term, upon revocation of his supervised release from a bank robbery conviction. On appeal, he argues that the district court instead should have imposed inpatient treatment.
*609 After careful review of the record, we find that the sentence was within the limits of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Grimes, 54 F.3d 489, 492 (8th Cir.1995) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
71 F. App'x 608 (United States v. Kendrick R. Epping) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.