United States v. Kendrick R. Epping
This text of 71 F. App'x 608 (United States v. Kendrick R. Epping) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kendrick Epping appeals the district court’s 1 imposition of a 10-month prison term and an additional 26-month supervised-release term, upon revocation of his supervised release from a bank robbery conviction. On appeal, he argues that the district court instead should have imposed inpatient treatment.
*609 After careful review of the record, we find that the sentence was within the limits of 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) and was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Grimes, 54 F.3d 489, 492 (8th Cir.1995) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm, and we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
. The Honorable Ronald E. Longstaff, Chief Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of Iowa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
71 F. App'x 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kendrick-r-epping-ca8-2003.