United States v. Kemp

174 F. App'x 660
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Kemp. Read the opinion of the Court — 500 F.3d 257
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 14, 2006·No. 05-1224·Unpublished

Opinion

OPINION

BECKER, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, appellant Elijah Shaheed Kemp entered a plea of guilty to felony charges involving the distribution of narcotics. He was sentenced to 92 months imprisonment.

Appellant challenges his sentence under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005). In United States v. Davis, 407 F.3d 162 (3d Cir.2005) (en banc), an opinion relating to the denial of a government petition for rehearing en banc concerning consideration of a Booker claim on plain error review, this Court stated that except in limited circumstances we will presume prejudice and direct a remand for re-sentencing where the district court imposed a sentence in the belief that the applicable Sentencing Guidelines were mandatory. That was the situation here, and we perceive no circumstance in this case which warrants a different result from that found in Davis.

We will therefore vacate the judgment and remand for re-sentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kemp, 174 F. App'x 660 (3d Cir. 2006).

174 F. App'x 660 (United States v. Kemp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related