United States v. Kelly

District of Columbia

United States v. Kelly

266 F. Supp. 3d 92

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedSeptember 29, 2017

DocketCriminal No. 2010-0293

StatusPublished

This text of 266 F. Supp. 3d 92 (United States v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Kelly, 266 F. Supp. 3d 92 (D.D.C. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge

The United States Probation Office filed-a Probation Petition [Dkt. 41] on June 9, 2017, requesting that defendant George Kelly’s conditions of supervised release by modified to include a thirty-day term of home detention and to require that he provide third-party risk notification of his prior offenses to his employer. The undersigned referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather, who held a hearing on August 24, 2017.

After consideration of the arguments and evidence presented by the parties and the Probation Office, Magistrate Judge Meriweather issued a Report and Recomr mendation [Dkt. 48] on September 11, 2017. She recommends that the Court grant the request to modify Mr. Kelly’s supervised release conditions to include a thirty-day term of home detention, as a reasonable response to non-compliant behavior. Mr. Kelly does pot oppose this recommendation. Magistrate Judge Meri-weather further recommends that..the Court deny the request to modify ,Mr. Kelly’s supervised release conditions to require third-party risk notification to his employer, as this, requested condition is not reasonably, necessary to protect the public. Counsel- for both parties have represented to the Court, that they do not object to these recommendations. Accordingly, upon consideration of . the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and the parties’ decisions not to object thereto, itls hereby

ORDERED that the recommendations made by Magistrate Judge Meriweather in the Report and Recommendation are ADOPTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Probation Office’s request to modify Mr. Kelly’s conditions of release to include a thirty-day term of home detention is GRANTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Probation Office’s request to modify Mr. Kelly’s conditions of release to require that he provide third-party risk notification of his prior offenses to his employer is DENIED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Kelly’s conditions of supervised release' are modified to include a thirty-day term of home detention.

SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge

The United States Probation Office filed-a Probation Petition [Dkt. 41] on June 9, 2017, requesting that defendant George Kelly’s conditions of supervised release by modified to include a thirty-day term of home detention and to require that he provide third-party risk notification of his prior offenses to his employer. The undersigned referred this matter to Magistrate Judge Robin M. Meriweather, who held a hearing on August 24, 2017.

After consideration of the arguments and evidence presented by the parties and the Probation Office, Magistrate Judge Meriweather issued a Report and Recomr mendation [Dkt. 48] on September 11, 2017. She recommends that the Court grant the request to modify Mr. Kelly’s supervised release conditions to include a thirty-day term of home detention, as a reasonable response to non-compliant behavior. Mr. Kelly does pot oppose this recommendation. Magistrate Judge Meri-weather further recommends that..the Court deny the request to modify ,Mr. Kelly’s supervised release conditions to require third-party risk notification to his employer, as this, requested condition is not reasonably, necessary to protect the public. Counsel- for both parties have represented to the Court, that they do not object to these recommendations. Accordingly, upon consideration of . the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and the parties’ decisions not to object thereto, itls hereby

ORDERED that the recommendations made by Magistrate Judge Meriweather in the Report and Recommendation are ADOPTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Probation Office’s request to modify Mr. Kelly’s conditions of release to include a thirty-day term of home detention is GRANTED; it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Probation Office’s request to modify Mr. Kelly’s conditions of release to require that he provide third-party risk notification of his prior offenses to his employer is DENIED; and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Kelly’s conditions of supervised release' are modified to include a thirty-day term of home detention.

SO ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 F. Supp. 3d 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kelly-dcd-2017.