United States v. Kelly

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 6, 2002
Docket01-31380
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Kelly (United States v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kelly, (5th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-31380 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GLENN WAYNE KELLY,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 01-CR-50061-ALL -------------------- May 2, 2002

Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Glenn Wayne Kelly appeals from his sentence following his

guilty plea conviction for being a felon in possession of a

firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Kelly challenges

the district court’s four-point increase in the total offense

level for possession of a firearm “in connection with another

felony” pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2K2.1(b)(5). Kelly argues that

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-31380 -2-

the Government did not establish that he possessed a firearm in

connection with a felony offense as required by § 2K2.1(b)(5).

The district court’s application of the § 2K2.1(b)(5)

enhancement will be upheld unless it is implausible in light of

the record as a whole. See United States v. Condren, 18 F.3d

1190, 1199 (5th Cir. 1994). The Government was required to show

only that the gun was available to Kelly and that the weapon

could have been used to facilitate the other crime. Condren, 18

F.3d at 1197-1200; United States v. Armstead, 114 F.3d 504, 511-

512 (5th Cir. 1997). We have reviewed the record and conclude

that the district court did not err in applying § 2K2.1(b)(5).

Kelly’s sentence is therefore AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Condren
18 F.3d 1190 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Armstead
114 F.3d 504 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Kelly, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kelly-ca5-2002.