United States v. Kelly

102 F. App'x 838
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 27, 2004
Docket02-4380
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 102 F. App'x 838 (United States v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kelly, 102 F. App'x 838 (4th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Leroy J. Kelly pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to commit and to attempt to commit armed robbery of several restaurants, supermarkets, and convenience stores, in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (2000), and two counts of using a firearm during a crime of violence, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2000). The district court sentenced Kelly to 312 months in prison. Kelly timely appealed, challenging the constitutionality of the Hobbs Act as applied to his ease. * The Hobbs Act contains a jurisdictional element requiring a case-by-case determination regarding whether the defendant’s conduct impacted interstate commerce. This jurisdictional requirement can be established by a minimal effect on interstate commerce. See 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a) (2000); United States v. Williams, 342 F.3d 350, 354 (4th Cir.2003), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 124 S.Ct. 1189, 157 L.Ed.2d 1219 (2004). Our review of the record shows that there was sufficient evidence to establish jurisdiction to prosecute. We find any further challenge to Kelly’s conviction under the Hobbs Act is foreclosed by his guilty plea. Menna v. New York, 423 U.S. 61, 62-63 n. 2, 96 S.Ct. 241, 46 L.Ed.2d 195 (1975); Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267, 93 S.Ct. 1602, 36 L.Ed.2d 235 (1973). Accordingly, we affirm Kelly’s conviction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The court previously dismissed Kelly’s appeal as to all other issues.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kelly v. United States
543 U.S. 1013 (Supreme Court, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 F. App'x 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kelly-ca4-2004.