United States v. Kelly
This text of United States v. Kelly (United States v. Kelly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-7288
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
ROBERT ANTHONY KELLY, JR.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western Dis- trict of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief Dis- trict Judge. (CR-94-43, CA-98-97-R)
Submitted: March 11, 1999 Decided: March 17, 1999
Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Anthony Kelly, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Julie C. Dudley, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Robert Anthony Kelly, Jr., seeks to appeal the district
court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255
(West 1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the dis-
trict court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on
the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Kelly,
Nos. CR-94-43; CA-98-97-R (W.D. Va. June 29, 1998). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Kelly, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kelly-ca4-1999.