United States v. Kelley

76 M.J. 39, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 982
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided December 8, 2016·No. No. 17-0064/AR·Published

Opinion

CCA 20140701. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issues:

[40] I.WHETHER ACCEPTANCE OF APPOINTMENT AS A CMCR JUDGE TERMINATED THE MILITARY COMMISSION OF JUDGE HERRING.
II.WHETHER, AS AN APPOINTED JUDGE OF THE CMCR, JUDGE HERRING DID NOT MEET THE UCMJ DEFINITION OF APPELLATE MILITARY JUDGE.
III.WHETHER THE ASSIGNMENT OF INFERIOR OFFICERS AND PRINCIPAL OFFICERS TO A SINGLE JUDICIAL TRIBUNAL ITSELF VIOLATED THE APPOINTMENTS CLAUSE.

No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kelley, 76 M.J. 39, 2016 CAAF LEXIS 982 (Ark. 2016).

76 M.J. 39 (United States v. Kelley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.