United States v. Keith Williams
This text of United States v. Keith Williams (United States v. Keith Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 23 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-10389
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:14-cr-00321-GMN-NJK-3 v.
KEITH WILLIAMS, MEMORANDUM*
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Gloria M. Navarro, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 17, 2022**
Before: S.R. THOMAS, PAEZ, and LEE, Circuit Judges.
Keith Williams appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges his
guilty-plea conviction and total 147-month sentence for conspiracy to interfere
with commerce by robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1951; three counts of
interference with commerce by robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1951; and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation of
18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 924(c)(1)(A). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), Williams’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for
relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided
Williams the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se
supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Williams waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Our
independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80
(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United
States v. Goodall, 21 F.4th 555, 562-65 (9th Cir. 2021). We accordingly dismiss
the appeal. See id. at 565.
However, we remand for the district court to amend the written judgment to
reflect the correct statutes of conviction for Count 13: 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and
924(c)(1)(A).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED; REMANDED with instructions.
2 17-10389
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Keith Williams, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-keith-williams-ca9-2022.