United States v. Keith Jelks

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 1, 2019·No. 18-13792·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 18-13792 Date Filed: 05/01/2019 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________

No. 18-13792 Non-Argument Calendar ________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:17-cr-00014-MW-GRJ-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KEITH JELKS,

Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida ________________________

(May 1, 2019)

Before MARTIN, NEWSOM, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: Case: 18-13792 Date Filed: 05/01/2019 Page: 2 of 2

Megan Saillant, appointed counsel for Keith Jelks in this direct criminal

appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and

filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our

independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the

relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is

GRANTED, and Jelks’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Keith Jelks, (11th Cir. 2019).

United States v. Keith Jelks (United States v. Keith Jelks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)