United States v. Keith Frazier

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 11, 2013·No. 12-8147·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8147

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KEITH EDWARD FRAZIER,

Defendant - Appellant.

No. 13-6308

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (4:11-cr-00113-F-1)

Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 11, 2013

Before DIAZ and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Edward Frazier, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Keith Edward Frazier seeks to appeal the district

court’s orders denying his pro se motions to withdraw his guilty

plea. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and

collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Cohen v. Beneficial

Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders

Frazier seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable

interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we dismiss the

appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before this court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Keith Frazier, (4th Cir. 2013).

United States v. Keith Frazier (United States v. Keith Frazier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)