United States v. Keith
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7949
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
CHARLES KEITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-4)
Submitted: June 16, 2006 Decided: July 11, 2006
Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Keith, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Charles Keith appeals the district court’s order denying
his motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order
denying his motion for resentencing. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Keith,
No. CR-97-4 (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Keith (United States v. Keith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.