United States v. Keith

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 11, 2006·No. 05-7949·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7949

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

CHARLES KEITH,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CR-97-4)

Submitted: June 16, 2006 Decided: July 11, 2006

Before WIDENER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles Keith, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Charles Keith appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion for reconsideration of the district court’s order

denying his motion for resentencing. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Keith,

No. CR-97-4 (N.D. W. Va. Sept. 1, 2005). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Keith, (4th Cir. 2006).

United States v. Keith (United States v. Keith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.