United States v. Keith Atherton

134 F.4th 1009
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Keith Atherton. Read the opinion of the Court — 106 F.4th 888
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 24, 2025·No. 21-30266·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 24 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30266

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 6:18-cr-00351-AA-1 District of Oregon, v. Eugene

KEITH ATHERTON, AKA Keith James ORDER Atherton, AKA John Doe,

Defendant-Appellant.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c)

and Circuit Rule 40-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Keith Atherton, 134 F.4th 1009 (9th Cir. 2025).

134 F.4th 1009 (United States v. Keith Atherton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Vieyra
Ninth Circuit, 2026