United States v. Keith Atherton

134 F.4th 1009
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 24, 2025
Docket21-30266
StatusPublished

This text of 134 F.4th 1009 (United States v. Keith Atherton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Keith Atherton, 134 F.4th 1009 (9th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 24 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30266

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 6:18-cr-00351-AA-1 District of Oregon, v. Eugene

KEITH ATHERTON, AKA Keith James ORDER Atherton, AKA John Doe,

Defendant-Appellant.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c)

and Circuit Rule 40-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Vieyra
Ninth Circuit, 2026

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 F.4th 1009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-keith-atherton-ca9-2025.