United States v. Keidric Cook

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Keidric Cook

206 F. App'x 934

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Keidric Cook. Read the opinion of the Court — 140 F. App'x 203 →

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided November 20, 2006·No. 05-16594·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Russell K. Ramey, appointed counsel for Keidric Cook, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Cook’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Russell K. Ramey, appointed counsel for Keidric Cook, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no issues of arguable merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED and Cook’s sentence is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Keidric Cook, 206 F. App'x 934 (11th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

206 F. App'x 934 (United States v. Keidric Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related