United States v. Keegan Van Tuyl

401 F. App'x 283
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 28, 2010·No. 10-30020·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Keegan C. Van Tuyl appeals from the sentence imposed upon revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm in part, vacate in part, and remand.

Van Tuyl’s sole contention is that the supervised release condition prohibiting association with Neo-Nazi/white supremacist affiliates is unconstitutionally over-broad. The government agrees that the judgment should be changed to explicitly reflect that the condition prohibits association -with known neo-Nazi/white supremacist affiliates. Under these circumstances, we vacate the challenged condition and remand for the district court to re-sentence in a manner consistent with this opinion. See, e.g, United States v. Ross, 476 F.3d 719 (9th Cir.2007). The sentence is affirmed in all other respects.

VACATED in part; AFFIRMED in part; and REMANDED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Keegan Van Tuyl, 401 F. App'x 283 (9th Cir. 2010).

401 F. App'x 283 (United States v. Keegan Van Tuyl) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. James Douglas Ross
476 F.3d 719 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)