United States v. Kaymore
This text of 557 F. App'x 225 (United States v. Kaymore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Everett Cornelius Kaymore appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s previous denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United, States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010) (noting that a district court does not have authority to reconsider prior order on § 3582 motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
557 F. App'x 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kaymore-ca4-2014.