United States v. Kaymore

557 F. App'x 225
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 26, 2014
DocketNo. 13-7625
StatusPublished

This text of 557 F. App'x 225 (United States v. Kaymore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kaymore, 557 F. App'x 225 (4th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Everett Cornelius Kaymore appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reconsider the court’s previous denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2) (2012) motion for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United, States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir.2010) (noting that a district court does not have authority to reconsider prior order on § 3582 motion). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Goodwyn
596 F.3d 233 (Fourth Circuit, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
557 F. App'x 225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kaymore-ca4-2014.