United States v. Kayla Soto

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 6, 2018·No. 17-12667·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 17-12667 Date Filed: 04/06/2018 Page: 1 of 2

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-12667

Non-Argument Calendar

D.C. Docket No. 3:16-cr-00095-BJD-MCR-2 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

KAYLA SOTO, Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida

(April 6, 2018)

Before MARCUS, ROSENBAUM and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

The Government’s motion to dismiss this appeal pursuant to the appeal waiver in Appellant’s plea agreement is GRANTED. See United States v. Bushert, 997 F.2d 1343, 1350-51 (11th Cir. 1993) (sentence-appeal waiver will be enforced

Case: 17-12667 Date Filed: 04/06/2018 Page: 2 of 2

if it was made knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Romano, 314 F.3d 1279, 1281 (11th Cir. 2002) (an argument that the government breached the plea agreement will be reviewed for plain error where it was not raised before the district court); United States v. Copeland, 381 F.3d 1101, 1104-05 (11th Cir. 2004) (sentence-appeal waiver will not foreclose a defendant’s appeal that the government breached the plea agreement at sentencing).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Kayla Soto, (11th Cir. 2018).

United States v. Kayla Soto (United States v. Kayla Soto) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Anthony Graziano Romano
314 F.3d 1279 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)
United States v. William Copeland
381 F.3d 1101 (Eleventh Circuit, 2004)
United States v. James Bushert
997 F.2d 1343 (Eleventh Circuit, 1993)