United States v. Kaufman

874 F.2d 242
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMay 17, 1989
DocketNos. 87-1462, 87-1621
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 874 F.2d 242 (United States v. Kaufman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Kaufman, 874 F.2d 242 (5th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

[243]*243ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Opinions Oct. 17, 1988 & March 1, 1989, 858 F.2d 994 (5th Cir.1988);

869 F.2d 1485 (5th Cir.1989)

Before KING, JOHNSON and JOLLY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The petition for rehearing is DENIED. In response to the defendant’s petition for rehearing, our opinion reported at 858 F.2d 994 (5th Cir.1988), has been submitted to the State Department for its review. The State Department has indicated its approval of the denial to the Franks of the benefits of the rule of specialty contained in the treaty between the United States and Mexico since “only an offended nation can complain about the purported violation of an extradition treaty,” and Mexico has made no protest whatever about the prosecution of the Franks brothers in Texas.

No member of this panel nor judge in regular active service on the court having requested that the court be polled on rehearing en banc, (Fed.R.App.P. and Local Rule 35), the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Roger Day, Jr.
700 F.3d 713 (Fourth Circuit, 2012)
State v. Graham
2012 S.D. 42 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 2012)
Antwi v. United States
349 F. Supp. 2d 663 (S.D. New York, 2004)
United States v. Nosov
153 F. Supp. 2d 477 (S.D. New York, 2001)
United States v. Odom
53 M.J. 526 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 2000)
United States v. Medina
985 F. Supp. 397 (S.D. New York, 1997)
United States v. Ramon Puentes
50 F.3d 1567 (Eleventh Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Carlos I. Miro
29 F.3d 194 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Miro
Fifth Circuit, 1994

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
874 F.2d 242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-kaufman-ca5-1989.