United States v. Katso

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

United States v. Katso

73 M.J. 413

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces

DecidedJune 9, 2014

DocketNo. 14-5008/AF

StatusPublished

This text of 73 M.J. 413 (United States v. Katso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Katso, 73 M.J. 413 (Ark. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

CCA 38005. Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals was filed under Rule 22 this date on the following issue:

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT FOUND APPELLEE’S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO CONFRONTATION WAS VIOLATED WHEN THE MILITARY JUDGE PERMITTED, OVER DEFENSE OBJECTION, THE TESTIMONY OF THE GOVERNMENT’S DNA EXPERT, AND THAT THE ERROR WAS NOT HARMLESS

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 38005. Notice is hereby given that a certificate for review of the decision of the United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals was filed under Rule 22 this date on the following issue:

WHETHER THE AIR FORCE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS ERRED WHEN IT FOUND APPELLEE’S SIXTH AMENDMENT RIGHT TO CONFRONTATION WAS VIOLATED WHEN THE MILITARY JUDGE PERMITTED, OVER DEFENSE OBJECTION, THE TESTIMONY OF THE GOVERNMENT’S DNA EXPERT, AND THAT THE ERROR WAS NOT HARMLESS

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

73 M.J. 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-katso-armfor-2014.