United States v. Katheryn Sherman
This text of 616 F. App'x 238 (United States v. Katheryn Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Katheryn Elizabeth Sherman appeals her sentence on her conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, for conspiracy to submit false claims against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 286.
Sherman’s attorney has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting that there are no non-frivolous grounds to appeal. Sherman filed a pro se supplemental brief. The government filed no answer brief.
Because our independent review of the record indicates that the plea agreement, including the waiver of the right to appeal, was entered knowingly and voluntarily, United States v. Aguila-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998), we enforce the waiver, GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw, and DISMISS the appeal.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
616 F. App'x 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-katheryn-sherman-ca9-2015.