United States v. Katheryn Sherman

616 F. App'x 238
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 3, 2015
Docket14-30135
StatusUnpublished

This text of 616 F. App'x 238 (United States v. Katheryn Sherman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Katheryn Sherman, 616 F. App'x 238 (9th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Katheryn Elizabeth Sherman appeals her sentence on her conviction, pursuant to a guilty plea, for conspiracy to submit false claims against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 286.

Sherman’s attorney has moved to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting that there are no non-frivolous grounds to appeal. Sherman filed a pro se supplemental brief. The government filed no answer brief.

Because our independent review of the record indicates that the plea agreement, including the waiver of the right to appeal, was entered knowingly and voluntarily, United States v. Aguila-Muniz, 156 F.3d 974, 976 (9th Cir.1998), we enforce the waiver, GRANT counsel’s motion to withdraw, and DISMISS the appeal.

DISMISSED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 F. App'x 238, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-katheryn-sherman-ca9-2015.